NIO bid to have names redacted at Omagh bomb inquiry is rejected

THE chairman of the Omagh Bombing Inquiry has rejected a bid by the British Government to redact the names of junior civil servants in documents shared with other parties involved in the inquiry.

The Northern Ireland Office (NIO) had argued that junior members of the civil service had more expectation of privacy than senior civil servants and it had raised potential security concerns over sharing their names.

However, inquiry chairman Lord Turnbull has refused the application made by Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn.

As a result, the documents, which are already in the possession of the inquiry, will now be shared with other core participants.

The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins.

The public inquiry, which will resume hearings later this month, was set up by the previous government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities.

In his ruling into Mr Benn’s application, he inquiry chairman said the issue under consideration only related to sharing the documents with other core participants in the inquiry, and did not relate to the potential for them to be made public.

Lord Turnbull stressed that all core participants are bound by confidentiality agreements. He said the issue about the potential publication of the names during the inquiry proceedings would be dealt with at a later juncture.

“This ruling is not concerned with the separate question of whether the content of any documentation which is disclosed in an unredacted fashion may, in due course, be aired in evidence and, or, published in the media,” he said.

Mr Benn’s application was considered during procedural hearings in Belfast last month. During proceedings, the inquiry also considered a submission on the PSNI’s position in respect of disclosing the names of people suspected of involvement in the 1998 attack and other linked terror activity.

The PSNI did not make an application for redaction, and instead just set out its own view in respect of the issue.

During the hearings, several media organisations also made representations in respect of both the Government and PSNI’s submissions.

In relation to the naming of suspects, Lord Turnbull said the matter was more “straightforward” than the application to redact junior civil servants’ names.

“In the end, there was no dispute between any of the contributing counsel as to what the correct approach should be,” he added.

The inquiry intends to put suspects in one of two categories – those who have been named publicly in the media or Parliament already, and those who have not.

Those in the first category will be assumed not to have a “reasonable expectation” of privacy.

Those in the second category will be subject to further examination by the inquiry to consider issues around privacy rights and security risks.