No decision on Dromore farm shop

A POPULAR farm shop and play area near Dromore has been given a second chance at planning approval after local councillors failed to reach a decision on whether it should be allowed to remain.

The development on the Dooish Road includes a farm shop, car park, enclosed dog play area, and a children’s playpark.

It had been operating without formal approval and was recently refused planning permission by council officers – but now the matter has been handed back to planners following a council meeting yesterday (Wednesday) afternoon.

The application, which is retrospective, aims to retain the existing facilities.

Council planning officials had recommended refusal on several grounds, including concerns that the development lacks visual integration into the rural landscape and could erode the area’s character.

Planners also criticised its siting, arguing it does not cluster with existing farm buildings and that alternative, less intrusive locations are available.

However, the development has drawn strong support from the community and local representatives.

Sinn Féin councillor Colette McNulty, who represents Dromore, said she regularly hears positive feedback from residents.

She highlighted its accessibility for people with mobility issues and described it as a valuable stop-off point for long-distance travellers and a boost to local tourism.

West Tyrone DUP MLA Tom Buchanan also lent his support in writing, praising the shop and play areas as vital rural amenities.

He said the dog facility offers a much-needed secure space for pet owners, and that families in the area value having a nearby playpark instead of needing to travel to urban centres.

The original refusal decision was ‘called in’ by Trillick Sinn Féin councillor Stephen McCann, forcing further discussion at the committee level. The matter has now been delegated back to planning officers for a final decision.

The council had based its refusal on three key issues: The development’s visual impact, its effect on rural character, and its location away from existing farm buildings – suggesting it does not meet planning policy requirements for farm diversification.